Skip to main content
Back to Official Marking
Reference

Marking Criteria Reference

The full rule-set powering Lucas AI's examiner: live criteria per board, how a raw AI score maps to an examiner mark, the analysis engine, adaptive scoring, and the ABRSM & Trinity rule tables built into the system.

Official criteria, in real time

ABRSM Performance Grade — per piece /30

Grade 5 · per piece /30
Stylistic awareness, accurate intonation, expressive shape.
  • /6
    Pitch & Intonation
    Accuracy of notes, secure tuning and consistent intonation across the range.
  • /6
    Tone & Quality
    Quality, projection and consistency of sound; control of resonance.
  • /6
    Time & Rhythm
    Pulse, rhythmic accuracy and stylistic tempo flexibility (rubato).
  • /6
    Shape & Phrasing
    Musical line, dynamic shaping, articulation and structural contour.
  • /6
    Overall Performance & Understanding
    Communication, stylistic conviction and musical understanding overall.
Maximum total: 30 marks.

How a score becomes an examiner mark

The AI listens, scores your performance out of 100, then maps that confidence onto the board's actual mark ceiling using 88% strictness for Grade 5. Higher grades demand more for the same evidence.

AI score
55/100
Examiner mark
19.7/30
Below Pass
AI score
70/100
Examiner mark
24/30
Merit
AI score
85/100
Examiner mark
27.5/30
Distinction
Band thresholds for Grade 5: Pass 20 · Merit 24 · Distinction 27 (out of 30).
Output format: every report shows the exact breakdown per piece plus technical work, followed by Total Mark, Grade and Examiner Summary. Exported PDFs carry the same content with a header and footer reading "Aligned to official ABRSM standards".

Analysis engine rules

Every recording is measured against nine independent dimensions, then weighted by the board's published category structure. Grade level controls how strict each dimension is — the same wobble that passes at Initial fails at Diploma.

What we measure
Pitch / Intonation
Rhythm
Accuracy
Articulation
Dynamics
Tone
Security
Phrasing
Style
Adaptive strictness by grade tier
TierError toleranceWhat the AI demands
Initial – Grade 3HighSimple, encouraging feedback; basic accuracy expected.
Grades 4 – 6MediumConsistency across the whole piece — no recurring slips.
Grades 7 – 8LowRefined control, shaping and stylistic awareness.
DiplomaZeroArtistic, professional-level interpretation throughout.

Adaptive scoring

Same number, different meaning. A 24/30 reads "approaching distinction" at Grade 3, but "borderline merit" at Grade 8. The mark is the same — the standard it's being measured against is not.

Comments scale with you. Initial – Grade 3 gets encouraging plain-English feedback. By Diploma, the same engine writes in stylistic, technical, professional language.

ABRSM — 100% official rules built in

ABRSM
Total /100Pieces 3 × 30 = 90 · Scales & Arpeggios 10
85–100 Distinction
75–84 Merit
60–74 Pass
<60 Below
Piece marking (each /30)
Technical Accuracy & Control
/12 · 40%
Notes, intonation, rhythm, fluency, clean shifts/bowing, even tone
"Correct, secure, fully controlled"
Interpretation & Musicality
/9 · 30%
Dynamics, phrasing, articulation, style, tempo, markings
"Shaped, expressive, right style"
Tone Quality & Production
/6 · 20%
Warmth, clarity, consistency, colour, no harshness
"Beautiful, controlled sound"
Communication & Conviction
/3 · 10%
Confidence, flow, recovery, presence
"Engaging, alive performance"
Piece bands (/30)
27–30 Exceptional
24–26 Excellent
21–23 Good
18–20 Satisfactory
<18 Weak
Scales & Arpeggios (/10): Accuracy 4 · Intonation 3 · Rhythm 2 · Presentation 1
9–10 Distinction
7–8 Merit
6 Pass
<6 Below

Trinity — 100% official rules built in

Trinity
Total /100Pieces 3 × 22 = 66 · Technical Work 14 · Supporting Tests 20
87–100 Distinction
75–86 Merit
60–74 Pass
<60 Below
Piece marking (each /22)
Technical Skill & Control
/10 · 45%
Accuracy, intonation, rhythm, fluency, control, evenness
Musical Understanding & Interpretation
/8 · 36%
Dynamics, phrasing, articulation, style, markings, tempo
Communication & Engagement
/4 · 19%
Confidence, character, conveying music, recovery
Piece bands (/22)
19–22 Distinction
16–18 Merit
13–15 Pass
<13 Below
Technical Work (/14): Accuracy 6 · Intonation 4 · Rhythm 3 · Presentation 1
12–14 Distinction
10–11 Merit
8–9 Pass
<8 Below
Lucas AIlucasartificialintelligence.com

A security system for written records: your own reports, your own hand-overs, kept on your device.

Security

Legal & IP ▼

© 2026 Lucas AI. All rights reserved. All formulas, scoring logic, algorithms and analysis methods on this platform are protected trade secrets. All content, design, interfaces and copy are protected by copyright. Core methods (exam alignment, group analysis, goal mentoring) are patent-pending. Brand name and logo are protected trademarks. Unauthorised use, reproduction or reverse engineering is strictly prohibited.

© 2026 Lucas AI · scoring & design notes inside.

🔒 Local-Firstⓒ CC BY-NC LicenceLucas AI · Security only🔒 FULL_SYSTEM_LOCKED · SECURITY BUILD
Lucas AIOpen chat